ProfitLink Logo
877-219-8012

Telecom Expense Management Blog

Choosing the Right Size Wireless Pool Plan for Your Users

Friday, September 09, 2011

Hai Yen Nguyen
Profit Link
877-219-8012

As a manager with responsibility for Wireless Expense Management you may be challenged with converting individual plans to pool plans. If you do some analysis, you can see that it is possible to reduce mobile phone expenses by a significant amount by simply placing all of the lines into an optimal pool plan. 

There is another benefit of the pool plans.  The number of minutes an employee uses in a given month can vary by as much as 100%, especially if the individual occasionally travels.  However, with all the users on a pool plan, the total usage usually doesn’t vary by more than 10%.  Obviously, the larger the pool, the less the monthly variance will be.  Therefore it is much easier to monitor and manage a pool plan rather than individual plans. If you manage your pool using a manual process or a spreadsheet, we think the optimal pool size is one that gives you about a 20% buffer over your average monthly usage. If you use a Wireless Expense Management solution, you can save money by reducing the number of minutes in your pool to give yourself a 10% buffer

Once you decide on the cost allocation methodology, the next step is to determine the monthly process to monthly monitor the pool plans and implement the cost allocation methodology.  I’ll discuss some ideas regarding this in my next post on Wireless Expense Management.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Loss of Company-Owned Mobile Devices: Company Data Security

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Hai Yen Nguyen
Profit Link
877-219-8012

The use of mobile devices increases the risk of loss of company data. This risk can be mitigated by using company liable mobile devices and following two practices. First, the company should maintain an accurate and updated inventory of all company-owned mobile devices along with each device’s user assignment. This is usually done as part of a telecom expense management process.  Second, the company should acquire the capability to remotely “wipe” or disable and delete all data from lost or stolen mobile devices.

Loss of Company-Owned Mobile Devices: Personnel Data Security

The use of mobile devices also increases the risk of loss of private data belonging to employees. An example of this type of loss could involve a human resources manager who loses a mobile device that contains company personnel data, such as employee tax identification numbers or medical information. If this type of loss occurs, we recommend employers notify employees immediately.  Here again, the employer can mitigate risk by implementing wireless expense management and maintaining  an accurate inventory of mobile devices and corresponding user assignments, along with the capability to remotely “wipe” mobile devices.

Mobile Devices and Enterprise Network Security and Performance

In addition to the risks discussed above, the use of mobile devices introduces vulnerabilities and potential performance issues into an enterprise’s network. Network security risks increase exponentially as an organization adopts mobile devices with e-mail and internet browsing capabilities, as a portfolio of such devices provides numerous attractive access points into a company’s network for viruses and hackers.  Telecom and IT managers must ensure that appropriate security measures are deployed to drive down risks as far as possible. Highly effective tools to manage risk include data encryption, firewalls, virus protection and the use of passwords.

It is very easy for employees to download applications onto company-owned smart phones, PDAs or mobile data devices. Some of these applications may create security risks or create network bandwidth bottlenecks. Employees should agree not to download software that is not approved by the company onto company-owned devices. Your service provider may provide utilities that prevent users from downloading unauthorized software or content.

Again, the employer can mitigate these risks by implementing wireless expense management maintaining an accurate inventory of mobile devices and corresponding user assignments, along with the capability to remotely “wipe” mobile devices. It is not good practice for the company to rely on wireless service providers to maintain this device and user assignment inventory, as it must be accurate and available at a moment’s notice.

My next post on the topic of wireless expense management will discuss the implications of employee use of company-liable wireless services.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Negotiating a Minimum Annual Revenue Commitment and Avoiding an Exclusivity Clause

Monday, August 22, 2011

Hai Yen Nguyen
Profit Link
877-219-8012

When you are negotiating your telecom contract, you should set your negotiation goal to be a Minimum Annual Revenue Commitment (MARC) that is 60% to 70% of the total annual spend with a telecom supplier. Your account rep will suggest that he or she can offer lower rates in exchange for a higher MARC. The truth is that, with larger dollar volume telecom contracts, there is very little correlation between rates and the level of MARC.

Define all services and fees that contribute to the MARC and try to get as many charges as possible to contribute. Your agreement should specify that services being used by new businesses or acquisitions will contribute towards your MARC.

Do not commit to using one supplier exclusively. You want to be able to move some services to another supplier during the term of the contract to exert leverage, if necessary. Avoid language that requires you to prove you are giving a certain percentage of your business to any carrier.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about the so called “regulatory fees” telecom carriers use to pad their profits.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about selecting an optimal agreement term and include a business downturn and business divestiture clause.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Telecom Contract Negotiation Tips

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Kitty Vo
Profit Link
877-219-8012

In addition to the subject matter-specific information I provided about negotiating a better telecom contract, we offer the following general negotiating tips:

  • Begin sourcing services 8-12 months before you need them so you don’t negotiate with your back against the wall.
  • If you do have a deadline coming up, don’t disclose it to the seller.
  • Understand what you need in great detail (this is the hardest and most time consuming part!).
  • Get quotes from multiple carriers to understand the market rates for the services you are sourcing.
  • Make a prioritized list of deal points to be negotiated. Be sure to include some items you can concede because they are not important to you.
  • Offer a justification for every negotiating position you take.
  • There is tremendous power in patience. Always tell the seller you do not have sole decision-making authority. This creates the perception of “institutionalized” patience.
  • “Silence is Golden.”
  • Never make two consecutive concessions to the seller. You can’t negotiate with yourself and obtain a favorable outcome.
  • It is easier to negotiate with friends than with adversaries.
  • Nobody likes to be made to look stupid.
  • Ask for additional small but important concessions from the seller at the end of the negotiating process as a condition of closing the deal.

Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Negotiating Billing Terms of a Telecom Contract

Monday, August 15, 2011

Hai Yen Nguyen
Profit Link
877-219-8012

A significant source of gross profit for telecom carriers is late payment fees. Carriers often set unreasonably short payment intervals that begin at their invoice date. They then take their time mailing their monthly invoice to you. As a result, many customers receive their invoices with less than two weeks to process them and remit payments. When customers are not able to process invoices this quickly, carriers charge them late payment fees of as much as 6.5% of the unpaid balance!

Your goal should be to get the carrier to waive late payment fees. This goal is very hard to achieve, as there is a time value of money and businesses typically do not extend free credit to each other. If your carrier will not waive late payment fees, see if they will agree to extend the payment interval to something your accounts payable process can make every month, like 45 days. You can also ask your carrier to specify that their payment interval begins on a date you can verify; such as the date you receive their invoice. Do not put yourself at the mercy of the carrier’s inefficient invoicing process. It can be expensive!

Two carriers we know of try to include language in their agreements that limits the amount of credits or refunds they will provide for billing errors to the most recent six months’ overcharges. We recommend rejecting this type of limitation for obvious reasons. Additionally, these limits are not competitive and they signal that the carrier has low confidence in the accuracy of its provisioning and billing processes.

If you plan to implement a telecom expense management solution during the term of the contract you may want to ask the carrier to specify if they offer invoices in Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) format.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about some great negotiating tips.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Refresh Technology on Your Terms, Not the Supplier’s.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Kitty Vo
Profit Link
877-219-8012

When negotiating a telecom contract, you should consider including a technology refresh clause. Technology refresh clauses address the risk that the lower-priced future technology could replace the existing higher-priced technology you currently use during the term of the term of the contract. You should negotiate a commitment from your supplier to upgrade you to future technology at no charge and reduce your minimum annual revenue commitment to reflect lower prices.

You should avoid giving your suppliers the right to migrate your services to a different technology at their discretion. As an example, in the recent past, many carriers attempted to commit customers to migrating from their existing Frame Relay networks to MPLS networks. You want to reserve the right to reject technology changes that create possible compatibility issues or impose significant additional costs.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about including a technology refresh clause in your contract.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Selecting an Optimal Agreement Term

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Kitty Vo
Profit Link
877-219-8012

When negotiating a telecom contract It is our opinion that, in most instances, the ideal term length is 36 months. With longer contract term lengths, you risk being locked into a contract as your business changes, as the market rates for the services you use drop, or as technology changes to your potential benefit. For shorter term lengths, carriers will typically not waive installation fees and only offer higher rates.

Your carrier agreement should state that at the end of the term, the contact will continue on a month-to-month basis with no change in rates. Your goal should be to avoid the inclusion of an auto renewal clause in your contract. If you cannot achieve this goal, your “fall back” position might be to include an auto renewal clause that limits each renewal term to one year and requires the carriers to provide 180 day notification of an impending auto renewal according to the terms of the notifications clause in the agreement.

All telecom contracts should include a business downturn and business divestiture clause. A business downturn clause stipulates that the supplier will renegotiate the agreement’s volume or revenue commitment if an unforeseen reduction in the customer’s revenue occurs. A business divestiture clause stipulates that the supplier will renegotiate the agreement’s volume or revenue commitment if the customer’s need for services is reduced due to sale or divestiture of a subsidiary, affiliate or operating unit that uses services provided under the agreement.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about including a technology refresh clause in your contract.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Build a Detailed Inventory of Your Current Telecom Services and Rates.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Kitty Vo
Profit Link
877-219-8012

“Knowledge is power.” “The devil’s in the details.” These truisms apply nowhere better than to telecom contract negotiations.

You should prepare for your telecom contract negotiations by building a highly detailed inventory of the types and volumes of services you currently use, as well as the rates, fees and surcharges you currently pay. The more rigor you apply to this exercise up front, the bigger your negotiating advantage will be.

For local services, build an inventory that lists each phone number or NPA NXX and total associated charges.

For data services, build an inventory that lists each circuit, its NPA NXX, each service element (loops, ports, mileage) and total associated charges.

For long-distance services, build an inventory of minutes used each month for the past twelve months, along with the net, post discount, per minute rates for each call type: outbound, inbound, interstate, intrastate for each state, and international. Be sure you understand what you are paying for long distance access loops, account fees, billing fees, 800 number fees, surcharges, regulatory fees, etc.

For mobile services build an inventory of devices subtotaled by NPA NXX, peak minutes used for each number over the past three months and total associated charges.

Collecting and compiling service information to build a detailed inventory of your services and corresponding rates is often a highly complex and time consuming undertaking. That’s why many busy IT and telecom professionals choose to hire ProfitLink to do the legwork for them. The incremental savings our customers realize by completing negotiations and implementing new lower rates more quickly makes partnering with ProfitLink an attractive investment.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about communicating your specific needs to candidate telecom suppliers.


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

Understanding and Minimizing so-called “Regulatory Fees.”

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Kitty Vo
Profit Link
877-219-8012

Telecom carriers seek to augment their gross profits by padding their monthly invoices with discretionary fees that drop straight to their bottom line. To suggest that government agencies mandate these extra, discretionary fees or that these fees might be taxes, carriers give the fees official sounding invoice descriptions like “FCC Charge,” FCC Primary Interexchange Carrier Charge,” “FCC End User Common Line Assessment” or “Federal Subscriber Line Charge”.

The truth is, none of these fees is mandated by any government entity and none of what you are paying is passed through to any government. The FCC and state agencies allow carriers to charge these fees and limit the amount they can charge, but that’s it. Push back hard against paying a “FCC Primary Interexchange Carrier Charge” or “PICC” (pronounced Pixie) on long distance services. These charges are no longer competitive and can almost always be negotiated away.

 “FCC End User Common Line Assessment” (or EUCL, pronounced “you cull”) or “Federal Subscriber Line Charge” (or SLC, pronounced “slick”) on local services are harder to get rid of, but see if you can negotiate a reduced rate.

Try to include in your contract language that states you will not pay installation fees, sub account fees, billing surcharges, invoice fees, etc.

In my next post on the topic of telecom expense management and negotiating a great telecom contract, I will write about the so called “regulatory fees” telecom carriers use to pad their profits.

By Kitty Vo, Telecom Analyst, ProfitLink Telecom Expense Management


Schedule a Call with the Author or Access Free Telecom Tools

© 2011 ProfitLink Telecom Consultants LLC. All Rights Reserved.                   Phone: 877.219.8012 Email: info@profitlinktelecom.com